Sunday, 31 August 2014

I Got You Covered: Ensuring Your Business Has Insurance When You Need It

Just in the last few years, there's been Hurricane Sandy thundering up the East Coast and causing more than $8 billion in damage to businesses just in New Jersey alone. On the other coast in California, the drought this year has racked up more than $2 billion in losses and cost thousands of job. Factor in record floods and tornadoes, and the threats aren't just to your life and safety, but to your company's survival as well. With each disaster, countless businesses suffer damage, only to discover too late that their existing insurance fails to provide necessary coverage.

A variety of other threats can pose risks to your company. You may face anything from injuries to your workers and customers, to fire that destroys your facilities, to lawsuits accusing you and your colleagues of failing to uphold duties to shareholders, clients and employees.

So when you buy insurance, you shouldn't be simply checking a box. You are investing in a life raft. When you hit an i ceberg, you don't want to find out the boat leaks or isn't big enough for all the passengers.

The Basics

Start with the basics: There are many types of insurance to address the risks that could threaten your business, but they often fall into three categories:

Injuries and death: First, there is insurance for injuries or death for those affected by the operation of your business. This category of insurance includes commercial general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance and product liability insurance.

Damage to property: Second, there is insurance for damage to property. This insurance also comes in many forms. For years, the most common form of this insurance was referred to as "all risk" or casualty insurance. More recently, this been referred to as "special causes of loss" insurance.

Executive protection: Third, there is insurance that protect s company officers, executives and directors for their roles and duties with your company. For example, directors' and officers' liability insurance ("D&O" insurance) provides protection if a company's shareholders allege wrongdoing by your business' senior managers. As our society has grown more litigious, insurance companies have created new types of insurance. You might procure fiduciary liability insurance to protect against employee claims of mismanagement of your business' 401(k) plan. Or you might buy employer's liability insurance for protection against employee allegations of sexual harassment or discrimination.

Of course, any individual business may face the need for special types of insurance. But, most importantly, you need to make sure you understand how your insurance will work and whether it provides the protection you need when you need it the most.

The Pitfalls

There are countless pitfalls you face when purchasing insura nce:

Not enough insurance: Some businesses find out all too late that they don't have enough insurance to cover their losses. For example, you might think that you have enough insurance to replace your building that recently burned down. Then you discover that newly enacted laws require that you reconstruct your building with more advanced fire or flood protection systems or expensive energy-saving materials, but your insurance does not cover the cost of these required enhancements.

The wrong insurance: In other instances, you haven't bought the insurance you need. Some companies are the victims of embezzlement. Unfortunately, they discover that their insurance could have, but does not, cover employee theft. The culprit may go to jail, but your stolen money is long gone.

Bad insurance: In rare, but not unheard of cases, businesses fall prey to outright insurance scams. In one case, we talked a client out of partici pating in a health insurance "pool" that promised low rates by grouping businesses together to create a fund that would pay employee insurance claims. The premiums were suspiciously low, the explanations didn't make sense and the paperwork was virtually nonexistent. Only later did our client discover that it had dodged a bullet because the arrangement was similar to a Ponzi scheme and the managers had walked off with most of the money they had collected.

Additional Considerations

Even if you do buy all the right insurance, you can still encounter significant problems. For example, a construction contractor might procure the appropriate property and liability insurance. Still, all of this protection does not provide for the replacement of defective work by subcontractors. Instead, the contractor must require its subcontractors to provide performance and payment bonds. These bonds require a deep-pocketed third party, a surety, to guarantee that faul ty or incomplete work will be fixed or finished and paid for by the surety.

Similarly, you can have all the insurance in the world but still not have taken the precautions to prove your claim. Consider the business that insures its inventory but keeps all the records of that inventory at the same site. A fire that destroys the inventory might also burn up the records necessary to maximize recovery of insurance proceeds. You need to determine not only what insurance you need, but also plan on how you will prove your claim.

You may need an experienced advocate to collect on your insurance claim. In the lifespan of your business, you will rarely sustain a major insured loss. However, insurance companies fend off claims on a daily basis. When you are up against an experienced insurance company, it is sometimes necessary to have a veteran advocate on your side, too. Consider hiring an experienced advisor to argue your case. They often work for a percentage of what they recove r, and quite often, the best ones pay for their efforts many times over by significantly increasing your recovery.

Whatever you do, don't buy your insurance because the insurance company has a cute mascot or the process is quick or the insurance is cheap. In fact, all of these attributes can be dangerous distractions. They don't get to the heart of why you are buying insurance: ensuring you have protection when you need it. When that next tremor or storm hits, you should have the comfort of knowing you have the right protection.

Life presents risks. With the right insurance plan, they can be hassles instead of business killers.

Understanding the Insurance Sector Scenario in India

Insurance

Whether it's Life or General Insurance, the insurance sector in India has surely revived over the past few decades due to privatization. Since the introduction of The Indian Insurance Companies Act in 1928, the major reform in the insurance industry came through in 1993 with the formation of the Malhotra Committee. Its aim was to determine the performance of the sector and guide through the prospective in the future.

The committee emphasized on the need of an independent governing body which brought in the formation of Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in 2000 to protect the interest of the policyholders and to help the insurance industry grow with their various strategies. Till date IRDA has applied 27 regulations pertaining to the insurers, insurance companies and the insurance agents.

The life insurance business took off in 1956 when it got nationalized after the Central Government took over 245 Indian and Foreign insurers and provident societies. It was when LIC came into existence with financial assistance from Government of India.

General Insurance concept in India dates back to 1850 when the British established Triton Insurance Company Ltd in Kolkata. The revival came through in 1973 when it got nationalized with 107 insurers forming four companies, namely,

  1.         i.            The New India Assurance Company;
  2.       ii.            The United India Insurance Company Ltd.;
  3.     iii.            The National Insurance Company Ltd.;
  4.    iv.            The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

In December 2000 these four arms were disintegrated and declared as independent insurance companies. Over the next few years the insurance industry saw a flood of new companies including 24 Life insurance companies and 27 General Insurance company. With the introduction of a pool of insurance companies, gradually the insurance sector in India became the biggest opportunity in India.Life insurance sector in India is already the largest in the world with 36 crore policies and is projected to grow at a rate of 12-15% in the next five years. For the General Insurance industry the growth was estimated at 15% for FY14. However, there has been a fluctuation and ambiguity noticed in the insurance sector in the last few years due to an unstable economy and some firm governing rules. At the time when more competitors are needed in the industry, the joint venture organizations are leaving, such as, Pantaloon Retail opting to auction off its 22.5% share in Future General India Life Insurance to IITL, ING leaving the ING Vysya Life insurance or New York Life Insurance opting out from Max India.

The major factors affecting the growth of Life Insurance in India:

  • unstable economy
  • firm regulations
  • inadequate financial savings
  • other macro-economic factors

Let's look at the insurance penetration in India from a global outlook:

table-aug-31

The above statistics are based on percentage of the insurance premium to GDP. As per IRDA reports, the insurance participation showed a rising trend in 2000 due to increased private players in the industry, however, gradually saw a dip towards 2012.

This also led to the fall of insurance density in India since 2011:

Insurance density is measured as the premium ratio to population. As per the graph we see that though there has been a gradual rise in the density due to private players joining the industry, there was a fall since 2011.

On the other hand the General Insurance industry recorded a notable growth in the last ten years. The compounded annual growth (CAGR) reported was 18% in financial year 2013. As opposed to the Government backed sectors (PSUs) the private sector companies have recorded an increased growth rate with a rise in market share to 47% in the first half of the financial year 2014 out of which the major contributor in the general insurance category is Motor Insurance. This category reported a market share of 46% alone in financial year 2013, followed by the Health and Personal Accident Insurance and Fire & Engineering segment.

Out of three major categories, Health and Personal Accident insurance is the only segment that should experience growth with more stress by the insurance companies, government initiations such as, RashtriyaSwasthBimaYojna and public realization while the other two may see a dip due to the lower GDP growth majorly.

The overall factors affecting the insurance penetration:

  • The fluctuating share markets have been one of the reasons due to which the ULIPs saw a downfall in the past few years. They have not been able to yield substantial returns even after five years, which led to IRDA to apply some strict regulatory measures on ULIPs in 2010. This further led to fall in sales due to a steep decline in the fund values;
  • The economic turbulence globally due to US in 2008 and Europe in 2011 which is going to remain for sometime especially on the Indian insurance sector;

High charges levied by the insurance companies despite the market  condition;

  • RBI reported many accusations on mis-selling of insurance policies which resulted in random cancellations;
  • Insurance agents gradually drifted away from ULIPs due to the stringent regulations laid on the product making it difficult to be sold and affecting their commission;
  • Turn-around time for the approvals is quite long for the new insurance policies;
  • Not many in India have a proper knowledge or clarity about insurance. Public awareness is still an issue; In fact, there is a lack of skilled and knowledgeable insurance agents who can guide the customer through various policies at the same time;
  • The overall insurance agent attrition rate is at 11% for the insurance industry which is a major concern.

Opportunity in the Indian Insurance Sector and Scope of Improvement:

Apart from the GDP growth which may not be in control, there are many other aspects that if paid attention to can lead to a substantial growth in the industry. Targeting the middle-class with more purchasing power or rural markets, building a skilled and professional network of agents even in the rural areas, presenting the customers with products specially designed to meet their needs, increased public awareness, balanced combination of regular polices with ULIPs, stressing on retirement plans & health plans, increased focus of availing policies through the use of internet, and dedicated customer service can serve as an accelerator to the gloomy scenario of the insurance sector. However, with the recent initiative from the Government of India, showing a green flag with 49% FDI in insurance and consent to the SEBI Act amendment, there is a ray of hope shining.

Madhuparna loves to express her opinion by scripting down ideas on various subjects - politics, movies, social issues, lifestyle and current affairs.

Saturday, 30 August 2014

Lawyer: Tracy Morgan struggling after June crash

86

42
Share This Story!

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Lawyer: Tracy Morgan struggling after June crash

An attorney for actor and comedian Tracy Morgan says he's having a tough time recovering from a June accident on the New Jersey Turnpike that left one person dead.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

]]>

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — An attorney for actor and comedian Tracy Morgan says he's having a tough time recovering from a June accident on the New Jersey Turnpike that left one person dead.

Morgan's attorney told the Star-Ledgerthat it may be months before Morgan can fully walk again and he relies on a wheelchair. Benedict P. Morelli says Morgan is making progress, but they'll have to wait a month before he is assessed "cognitively."

Morgan broke his leg, nose and several ribs in a six-car accident involving his limo bus in June. The bus was struck by a Walmart truck.

The driver of the Walmart truck that struck Morgan's limo bus pleaded not guilty to vehicular homicide and assault by auto.

Morgan accused Walmart of negligence in a federal lawsuit filed against the company.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1prj8Wu

USA NOW
#tansuit lights up Twitter, but what did Obama say? | USA NOW
Aug 29, 2014
0) { %>

0) { %>

0) { %>

]]>

After Napa Jolt, Quake-Proofing Your Homeowner’s Insurance

Photo
A house slid off its foundation in Napa, Calif., after an earthquake hit the area on Monday. Credit Peter Dasilva/European Pressphoto Agency

AS Napa County, Calif., recovers from the earthquake that jarred the area last weekend, many homeowners may be wondering whether they should buy special earthquake insurance.

"You better believe there's a lot of people who wish they had it," said Amy Bach, executive director of United Policyholders, a nonprofit consumer group focusing on insurance. Ms. Bach spent time early this week advising those affected by what is now officially known as the South Napa earthquake.

Standard homeowner's insurance policies generally don't include protection for earthquake damage to a home and belongings. That means you have to purchase extra coverage, which may be expensive if you live in a high-risk area. The policies also have high deductibles compared with other types of insurance, which may give potential buyers pause.

Continue reading the main story

Related Coverage

"For many, the damage incurred by the earthquake may never reach the deductible amount," noted a 2012 report from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' policy research arm.

Nationally, the proportion of Americans with quake coverage on their homes has been falling, according to research from the Insurance Information Institute, an industry-funded group. About 7 percent of Americans with homeowner's policies said they had earthquake insurance, down from 10 percent in 2013 and 13 percent in 2012, the institute found. Among homeowners earning $100,000 or more, 11 percent said they had quake coverage, while just 2 percent of those earning less than $35,000 did. Often, interest in coverage rises after a signific ant quake, said Loretta Worters, a spokeswoman for the institute.

Only about 10 percent of California residents have an earthquake policy, and just 6 percent carry one in Napa County, according to the California Earthquake Authority, the quasi-public agency that provides most policies in the state through its member insurance companies.

The average earthquake premium for homeowners in California is about $800 a year, said Glenn Pomeroy, chief executive of the earthquake authority. But it can be much higher, depending on how close you live to a known fault line and other factors.

California Earthquake Authority policies commonly have a deductible of 10 or 15 percent of a home's replacement value. So if your home were insured for $400,000 and your deductible was 10 percent, damage would have to total at least $40,000 before the policy paid out, Mr. Pomeroy said. If your home were destroyed, he noted, you wouldn't need to come up with the deductible out of pocket to receive a claim payment. Some policies offer a separate deductible for your belongings.

Other parts of the country are also vulnerable to earthquakes, although deductibles can be lower outside quake-prone California. The United States Geological Survey this year released updated seismic maps showing areas of relative hazard. Regions of elevated risk include an area encompassing southeastern Missouri and northeastern Arkansas and another in South Carolina. And lower risk doesn't mean no risk: In 2011, for instance, parts of the Ea st Coast were jolted by a 5.8-magnitude earthquake centered in Virginia.

Here are some questions about earthquake insurance:

How should I decide whether to buy earthquake coverage?

Ms. Bach advises consumers to check the U.S.G.S. map to see if they're in a high-risk area (The 16 states at highest risk, according to the government, are Alaska, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.) They should also weigh factors like the details of construction. For instance, she noted, a two-story home built over a garage might be at greater risk than a single-story home.

As with any sort of insurance, you should shop around, she said. Recently, when the premium on her own earthquake policy rose, she sought additional quotes and found a policy with a lower deductible. There are also programs available in California that let people buy additional insurance that can lower the deductible.

Can I buy earthquake insurance if I don't own my home?

If you rent, you can usually add earthquake coverage to your renter's insurance policy to cover damage to belongings — and premiums are typically much less expensive than homeowner's policies. In California, for instance, renters can buy earthquake coverage for $120 a year, Mr. Pomeroy said.

Won't the federal government cover losses from earthquakes?

Federal disaster grants — available if an area is declared a federal disaster area — are often limited in size and are reserved mainly for those with financial need based on their incomes, Ms. Bach said. Low-interest loans may be made available but, of course, must be repaid.

Friday, 29 August 2014

Lawyer: Tracy Morgan struggling, relies on wheelchair

40

25
Share This Story!

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Lawyer: Tracy Morgan struggling, relies on wheelchair

An attorney for actor and comedian Tracy Morgan says he's having a tough time recovering from a June accident on the New Jersey Turnpike that left one person dead.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

]]>

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — An attorney for actor and comedian Tracy Morgan says he's having a tough time recovering from a June accident on the New Jersey Turnpike that left one person dead.

Morgan's attorney told the Star-Ledgerthat it may be months before Morgan can fully walk again and he relies on a wheelchair. Benedict P. Morelli says Morgan is making progress, but they'll have to wait a month before he is assessed "cognitively."

Morgan broke his leg, nose and several ribs in a six-car accident involving his limo bus in June. The bus was struck by a Walmart truck.

The driver of the Walmart truck that struck Morgan's limo bus pleaded not guilty to vehicular homicide and assault by auto.

Morgan accused Walmart of negligence in a federal lawsuit filed against the company.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1prj8Wu

USA NOW
#tansuit lights up Twitter, but what did Obama say? | USA NOW
Aug 29, 2014
0) { %>

0) { %>

0) { %>

]]>

Rethinking Ghana’s Criminal Justice System: Setting The Agenda For A Paradigm Shift In Our Criminal Justice Delivery

The rather urgent need for a rethink of our criminal justice system can no longer remain either on the drawing board or continue to be a talk show, given the extreme consequences of the current sentencing policy which has failed to go beyond the fines and custodial disposals or thresholds.

Several factors may indeed account for the high rate of the over- crowding in our prison estates, nevertheless the most significant of it all is the fact that our sentencing courts have not been provided with any means of alternative to imprisonment (except with juvenile justice delivery system) even in the context of minor offences or what is professionally referred to as misdemeanor. Instances of imposing fines on offenders are somewhat rendered meaningless, due to non-compliance which may be due to the offender's lack of financial capacity to respond positively to the court order and thus ties the court's hands to the ultimate, the only ava ilable option- custodial sentence.

This clear evidence may explain how and why such offenders, sent to prison become unwilling associates and or companions of the sophisticated, entrenched, dangerous and die-hard offenders.

Although it is acceptable that for those who commit offences or crimes within their communities should have to be punished, the modern trend is for punishment to go beyond the retribution and 'punishment fits the crime' philosophy, as punishment is now to be seen to have the capacity to prevent re-offending, protect the public and offer a meaningful and practical scope for the rehabilitation of the offender- 'the rehabilitation ethos', promote reparation towards the victim/ community and offering a framework for the victim to attain closure. Indeed, punishment should offer the framework which although imposes some degree of restriction on the liberty of the offender, should similarly promote what has come to be known and referred to as the 3 R's ; the offender taking responsibility for his/her anti social behaviour, rehabilitation of the offender and reparation to either the victim or the community.

It is this paradigm shift initiative that should inform our penal policy, a policy direction that acknowledges and promotes' alternative to custody 'policy initiatives and programmes of intervention, to reflect the UN Standard Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures and Penal Reform International Conference's objectives adopted at its' conference, held between 13 and 27 April, 1999 . The Lord Chancellor of England and Wales, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, makes this point succinctly when contributing to a debate on 'Alternative to Custody:

The case for community sentencing, submitted amongst others '' when sentencing those who commit minor offences, the primary objective must be rehabilitation, and that sentencing must have the purpose of, making of reparation by offenders to persons affect ed by their offence(s), punishment of offenders, reduction of crime, reform of the offender and public protection'' It is in pursuant of this agenda that in some other jurisdictions, such as the UK, USA, Australia, Norway, Canada, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Malawi, Mali, Tanzania, Burkina Faso and Egypt, community sentencing as a mechanism of 'alternative to custody' has become the main feature of their criminal justice system, and it's worth mentioning that Liberia is the latest to be moving in this penal policy direction having solicited the assistance and support from the Penal Reform International (PRI) an International non –governmental organization based in the United Kingdom to realize this goal. THE STRATEGIC APPROACH TO PRACTICE:

It is my considered opinion that the time has come for all practitioners or call them stake-holders within the criminal justice system, voluntary organizations and those concerned with penal policy to embrace a much needed credible alter nate vision, one which offers practically best chance of driving a rehabilitative perspective of punishment to the centre of criminal justice administration and service delivery in our country, at much less of a financial, social and ethical cost.

The central focus for a rehabilitative philosophy is the provision of high quality, rigorous, robust and properly resourced community-based programmes of intervention, which have the capacity in providing the police, prosecutors, courts and the prisons with effective options for responding to the needs of offenders, in their quest for discharging their constitutional mandate- promoting and safeguarding public protection and public safety.

There is clear research evidence, demonstrated by practice in those jurisdictions where community sentences are the bedrock of criminal justice administration and service delivery, that if faith is placed in community sentencing, then the reduction in the prison population will also allow for more productive work to be undertaken in areas such as offence focused and cognitive behaviour modification therapeutic work, general-education, skills/trade training for those individuals that must be held in custodial regimes.

The evidence is that, the alternative of an ever rising prison numbers is simply unsustainable and will do nothing to promote community safety. Best practice approach is that, well structured community programmes of intervention, will undoubtedly raise community protection, bringing down the rate of re-offending and repay the damage(s) done by crime in a way which prison sentences cannot and would not.

This strategy should form a key component of our comprehensive approach to offender management and rehabilitation; empower people in conflict with the law to make amends for the harm they have caused, to address their personal, social and health challenges (drugs/alcohol dependency) which may lie behind their offending, develop their determination and appropriate skills they may require to lead law-abiding lifestyles.

The strategy is that positive steps need to be adopted now, to develop the relevant and appropriate penal policy that promotes and ensures that community penalties become integral elements of our criminal justice system, and that they are used as far as possible to displace prison sentences, as part of a broader and pragmatic strategy of using prison much more sparingly than has been the practice to date in our country. In pursuing this agenda, devising urgently, a sentencing guideline and indeed the legislative amendment of the criminal procedure code cannot be over-emphasized. The justice for all programme's initiative, which rightly identified a sentence review committee as one of its thematic spheres of intervention although may be said to have been a positive measure, it is regrettable to observe here that the first revised draft of a proposed sentencing guidelines, adopted by a sentencing revi ew committee at Koforidua in December, 2009 and submitted to the ministry of justice and attorney-general's department sometime in April 2010 by this author, has still remained on the shelves gathering dust to the best of my knowledge and understanding.

The expectation would have been for a sentencing - working team, to be judiciary driven and composed with stakeholder institutions within the criminal justice system, to have been set up with the clear mandate of discussing this first revised draft guidelines alongside with that l am given to understand was proposed by the commission for law reforms, streamline these documents into a final draft sentencing guidelines, for action by a National Sentencing Council/Committee, that would need setting up and with a mandate for public consultations.

Incidentally however, there might be a ray of sunshine for this first draft sentencing guidelines, given the current deputy attorney general had delivered a paper on the subject of prison congestion, the bail system and remand management within the criminal justice system and called for a reform at the justice for all reform seminar at Akosombo sometime in December 2009, only to reiterate this call during his recent vetting for his current post National Sentencing Council/Committee:

Such a national sentencing council/ committee should also be mandated to exercise the overall responsibility to publish a final definitive sentencing guideline. This should promote greater consistency in sentencing, whilst contributing to maintain the independence of the judiciary and increasing public understanding of sentencing. An effort that would be a pragmatic way forward, in the re-think of Ghana's criminal justice service delivery system in promoting the fundamental human rights philosophy and meeting international standards of best practice, thus giving a pragmatic and credible meaning to the concept of prison as the framework of rehabilitating, reforming, reinteg rating and resettling the offender back into his/ her community as a useful citizen ready to make those positive contributions towards national development and nation building

Amending the criminal procedure code:
To date, the criminal laws of our country and it's procedure code presents as the proverbial albatross at the neck of a reform of our penal system. Undoubtedly, these would require the relevant and appropriate amendments relating to the sentencing of offenders, with the aim to provide a clearer and more flexible sentencing framework, setting out in unambiguous terms, the five traditional purposes of sentencing as: The punishment of the offender, The reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence ), The reform and rehabilitation of the offender, Public protection, and The making of reparation by the offender to the victim.

The author a social care, offender management and rehabilitation consultant, operations director OMRO, a Ghanaian nongover nmental organization, is also an ardent penal reform advocate. For further details contact [email protected]/ 024 841 6287

Comments:
This article has 0 comment, leave your comment.

Thursday, 28 August 2014

For many Californians, cost of earthquake insurance outweighs the risks

Red tape surrounds a home damaged by Sunday's magnitude 6.0 earthquake in Napa, California August 25, 2014. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

(Reuters) - During Sunday's 6.0 magnitude earthquake, some $75,000 worth of bottles of wine, rum and whiskey flew off the shelves of Aiyaz Masani's liquor store in Napa, California. He estimates about half his inventory was damaged, winding up in three-foot piles in the aisles.

But that financial hit is far from enough to convince him to buy earthquake insurance for Redwood Liquor. That would mean forking over about 7 to 8 percent of his insured value of $100,000 in premiums alone, he said.

"It doesn't amount to good financial sense," Masani said on Monday, while standing beside a sidewalk dumpster where workers shoveled broken glass and the stench of fermenting alcohol hung in the air. "It's useless to buy insurance."

In one of the most quake-prone areas of the world, the cost of earthquake insurance remains too high for many California residents. Flood coverage is often more affordable and mandatory in areas of the country where hurricanes are frequent, but only 6 percent of Napa's residents carried coverage before Sunday's quake, the biggest to hit the Bay Area in 25 years and the first major quake in the state in two decades.

When The Big One hits, taxpayers may end up paying for much of the damage.

A repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, estimated at 7.8 magnitude, would cause some $93 billion in insured losses, according to an estimate by the Insurance Information Institute, an industry research group. Total economic losses would be three to four times that.

As the clamor for disaster relief rose, federal and state governments would be under "enormous pressure", said Bob Hartwig, president and economist of the Institute. "And that would be an understatement," he added.

WHY SKY HIGH

Catastrophe risk analysts say there are a few reasons for the high cost of quake insurance, notably the nature of earthquakes themselves. The federal government also backs the market for flood insurance but has a voided quake policies.

And mortgages from federally regulated or insured lenders, which require flood insurance for properties at high risk of inundation, do not require quake policies in active fault zones.

Compared to hurricanes, floods and tornadoes, earthquakes are rare, and they inflict much more damage.

Since the 1950s, there have been 11 earthquakes in the United States larger or equal to the 1994 Northridge quake near Los Angeles, a 6.7 magnitude which was the costliest on record. There have been about 59 major F5 tornadoes and 29 major landfall hurricanes recognized by the National Hurricane Center.

The risk models used by insurance companies to calculate earthquake rates are, at best, incomplete, say some analysts.

"They're usually way off in estimating earthquake losses," said Karen C lark, CEO of catastrophe risk modeling firm Karen Clark & Co. "The lack of data leads to high uncertainty and just in general the higher your uncertainty, the higher the price will be." If more people bought earthquake insurance, prices likely would go down, she added.

She expects only 10 percent of a major San Francisco quake's damage would be covered by insurance.

"It's a complicated risk, said Glenn Pomeroy, CEO of California Earthquake Authority, which has over $10.4 billion in claims paying capacity to cover its 856,000 policyholders. "That's why most insurance companies don't want to tackle it."

Twenty years ago, about a third of California residents were covered, paying an average premium of $200 a year, according to Patricia Grossi, earthquake expert and senior director at catastrophe risk modeling firm RMS.

The 1994 earthqu ake in Northridge caused about $24 billion in insured losses in 2013 dollars, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

The event scared off many insurers. "Companies hadn't seen that coming," said Pomeroy, whose group now covers 75 percent of homeowners who carry earthquake coverage. "Insurance companies started filing for massive rate increases, sometimes 10-fold, and coverage was becoming much more restrictive."

Since Northridge, the take-up rate has fallen to about 11 percent with annual premiums averaging $1,000, Grossi said.

By contrast, the average flood insurance premium in the United States is $650, often with a $500-$1,000 deductible, according to the National Flood Insurance Program, which has federal backing.

Earthquake coverage carries a deductible of about 10 to 15 percent. So the owner of a $1.3 million hom e with a 15 percent deductible, must pay $195,000 before the insurance ever kicks in. In some cases, deductibles for earthquake coverage can be upwards of $500,000 a year, said realtor CJ Nakagawa from the Susan Hewitt Luxury Group.

"Imagine that you've spent $400,000 over 20 years on your policy," Nakagawa said. "An earthquake hits and you're left with $400,000 in damages but your deductible is $500,000. That's $900,000. For that money, you could build a new home from scratch."

For many residents, the value of adding insurance is diminished because the U.S. federal government typically extends disaster relief. In a town hall meeting on Monday, many Napa officials and residents said they were counting on assistance from the U.S. federal government.

That's a common false assumption, the U.S. Government Accountability Office found in 2010, noting that a high percentage of pro perty owners rely "on good fortune or federal emergency disaster relief assistance to cover uninsured losses."

(Reporting by Deepa Seetharaman, Robin Respaut, and Christina Farr, editing by Peter Henderson)

Shift manager at WW ready to shift into higher gear

Although Annie Gontarek, 27, graduated from Penn State Abington last December with a bachelor's degree in criminal justice, she has made the shift to shift manager at the Weavers Way in West Mt. Airy. (Photo by Frankie Plourde)

Although Annie Gontarek, 27, graduated from Penn State Abington last December with a bachelor's degree in criminal justice, she has made the shift to shift manager at the Weavers Way in West Mt. Airy. (Photo by Frankie Plourde)

by Karen Plourde

Someday, Annie Gontarek will be able to put her time in the grocery business in her rear view mirror. But for now, being shift manager at Weavers Way (WW) Mt. Airy is a way to support herself while she works out what she wants to do next in life.

Annie, 27, graduated from Penn State Abington last December with a bachelor's degree in criminal justice. Her introduction to grocery retail was at Caruso's, where she started in 2006 after taking time off from Millersville University. (Caruso's, which was at 8424 Germantown Ave. for just over 100 years, closed in September, 2008. It was in the building now occupied by Weavers Way.)

"Caruso's was really, like, the first real job I had," she said, "and, y'know, it taught me a lot about customer service. Most of the times, I would be the only cashier … The people who worked there were really cool, too. So it was kind of like a family because it was so small."

Annie began working at Weavers Way in February, 2009, part-time as a cashier and took classes at Montgomery County Community College. About a year later, her older brother, Wes, was hired in the kitchen at Weavers Way Chestnut Hill, where he's now closing kitchen manager. "My mom was like, 'How would you feel if Wes applied at the Co-op?' I was like, 'No, I don't want to work with him.'" She backed off once her mom assured her he was applying only to Chestnut Hill, keeping 2.5 miles between them.

Annie and Wes often get together for lunch on Fridays, when they're both off. Of course, work seeps into their conversations. "We always end up talking about the Co-op, which is kind of annoying," she said. They also have an older sister, Kate, a social worker and the mother of two girls.

Although Annie grew up in East Mt. Airy, her family didn't belong to Weavers Way until she started working there. "People are like, 'Oh, did you grow up in the Co-op?' And I'm like, 'No.' I don't want to die at the Co-op, either."

This summer, Annie took four weeks off from Weavers Way to travel to South Korea with Jenna Balaban, who works in prepared foods in WW Mt. Airy. They were both adopted from Korea as infants.

"It was so fun. I would move there, like, if I could convince my family to move there," she said. She and Jenna flew into Busan, stayed with a former co-worker in Ulsan for a week, then traveled on to Seoul for another week.

"We took a taxi around a lot for the first week we were there, so everywhere we were going we would get the address on our phone in Korean, and we'd just have to show the taxi driver … But it was really cool. We went to … palaces; we went to a couple of parks … I didn't realize how much Koreans like sweets. There was a coffeehouse or cafe, like, every other storefront."

Now that she's back, the Wyndmoor resident is trying to figure out what she wants to be when she grows up. "My plan was … to settle down into a career, but now that I'm back, I don't know if I want to do that yet," she said. "… and a part of me is like, I'm still, like, kinda young. I'm not married, I don't have kids, so I can still kinda do whatever I want … so, I don't know."

While Annie's considering her options, the Co-op continues to give her a solid footing. "I like the feeling of community and the fact that, like, people know each other," she said. "It's just, like, a good feeling."

Weavers Way Co-op is a member-owned consumers' cooperative with stores open to everyone. Founded in 1973 as a neighborhood food buying club in a church basement in West Mt. Airy, Weavers Way has grown to more than 5,200 member households, with annual sales of nearly $20 million. After moving to its location at 559 Carpenter Lane, Weavers Way expanded, purchasing the adjacent building and consolidating the two buildings.

Subsequent expansions included the purchase of other buildings in the neighborhood, which house a pet supply store, health and wellness store and offices. In 2010, Weavers Way underwent a major expansion, adding a second store in Chestnut Hill, which had been vacant for two years after Caruso's closed. Then, in 2013, WW opened a health and beauty specialty store next door to WW Chestnut Hill.

More information about WW Chestnut Hill at 215-866-9150 or www.weaversway.coop.

Want to support the Local? Join the Chestnut Hill Community Association. Membership helps fund what we do. Join today.

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Community rallying behind Violi family as Attorney General investigates accident that severed employee’s arm

MASSENA — An ongoing investigation of an industrial accident at Violi's Restaurant by the state Attorney General's Office has led the family that owns the business to seek community support.

The brothers announced earlier this month the restaurant will close on Sept. 27.

According to friends and family members of Ross and Dominick Violi, the brothers who own the restaurant find themselves "under attack" by the attorney general's staff probe of an accident at the restaurant that seriously injured one of their employees.

Brett M. Bouchard, then 17, severed his arm while cleaning a pasta-making machine on April 24 at the 209 Center St. business.

Benjamin Hahn, a technician in the U.S. Labor Department Wage and Hour Division, said in April the legal age for an employee to operate a pasta-making machine is 18. He said at that time, a 17-year-old operating the machine would violate child labor laws, but it was unclear whether Mr. Bouchard's cleaning the machine would be considered operating it.

The teenager underwent four surgeries and was on a ventilator in a medically induced coma for several days following surgery. Doctors reattached his arm and repaired some of the nerve damage, but he makes regular return visits to Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, for follow-up care.

Casey Aguglia, a spokeswoman for the attorney general's office, said the investigation into the incident on the night Mr. Bouchard was injured remains ongoing.

"The attorney general's office is aware of the incident that occurred at Violi's on April 24 and the matter is under investigation," she said. "Unfortunately that's all I can tell you at this time. We can't comment on any ongoing investigations."

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Area Director Chris Adams said his office also is in the midst of its own investigation, which should be complete by the end of this week.

"We'll probably be reaching our conclusions very soon," he said.

Mr. Adams said he was unaware the attorney general's office was conducting its own investigation.

"We have not been contacted by the attorney general's office," he said.

Dominick Violi said it is his understanding that misdemeanor charges against him and his brother are pending.

"Charges against the corporation I would understand, but charges against us I just don't understand," he said. "I'm hoping the charges won't be against us as individuals. That's the whole reason you incorporate."

Ross Violi, who noted that no charges have been filed yet, said he believes that if charges are filed, they will be in connection to Mr. Bouchard's alleged illegal use of the pasta-making machine.

"The potential charges are connected to Mr. Bouchard's use of the equipment while under the age of 18," he said. "The employee was two months shy of his 18th birthday. If he was 18, none of this would even be in question."

In a letter addressed to friends and associates of the family, Dominick's wife, Susan Violi, said they are seeking letters of support from community members in an effort to dissuade the attorney general's office from filing charges against the two brothers.

"At the end of a family's culinary journey, Violi's Restaurant and the Violi family are under attack," she wrote. "After 70 years of being a respected steward to the north country, the Violi family is experiencing a legal battle with the partial aim of criminalizing the men who have contributed a great deal to the region."

"Dominick and Ross Violi have not only been passionate business folks, they have been there for those who have been in need of assistance. Whether it is raising funds for the local Hospice, the Louisville Fire Department, Trinity Catholic School, Massena Memorial Hospital or the Remington Museum, these men have never wavered in their commitment to assist others," she went on. "Now Ross and Dominick and their families need you."

Also contributing to the effort is Paul Jeser, a longtime friend of the Violis who now resides in Los Angeles. Mr. Jeser has taken out an advertisement that appears in today's Daily Courier-Observer appealing to others to offer their support for the family.

"We've already received more than 50 letters and right now are trying to figure out the best way to hand-deliver them to the attorney general," Mr. Jeser said in a phone interview Wednesday.

In his letter of support, Mr. Jeser wrote, "Dominick and Ross are two VERY special people. Yes, what happened to Brett Bouchard was tragic — but it was a tragic accident, not something punishable by prosecution. I, like you, see a lot of 'bad' in this world. I urge you to fix that 'bad,' but this is not one of those cases. I urge you to rethink the decision to prosecute these two good men."

Mrs. Violi and Mr. Jeser are asking people to send their letters of support to the restaurant at P.O. Box 446, Massena, N.Y. 13662, or via email at violismassena@aol.com.

"All letters and emails received will be hand delivered to the AG," Mr. Jeser said.

Among those writing letters of support for the Violis was Frederic Remington Art Museum Executive Director Laura Foster.

"I read the articles in the paper about the accident and the arm reattachment, but I didn't know anything about the potential criminal charges," Ms. Foster said, adding she became aware of the situation after speaking with Mrs. Violi and receiving a copy of the family's plea, which she then forwarded to museum trustees and staff.

Ms. Foster wrote in that email dated Aug. 20 that she will send a letter to the attorney general's office focusing on the Violi's generosity to the museum, especially their "wonderful pizza parties as part of the Art of Dining series."

Both brothers said the support they have received so far from the community has been greatly appreciated.

"These letters are just unbelievable," Dominick said, adding regardless of how the situation plays out, the family will be serving its last meals at the restaurant on Sept. 27.

Dominick said the decision to close the restaurant this year was made before the accident.

"Ross and I have been talking about this for a long time," Dominick said. "Ross had actually decided this was going to be his last year before the accident. The only thing the accident did was kill our business."

Dominick said he's getting ready to bring a group of people to Italy, so the timing of the restaurant's closure coincides with that trip. "It's a sad way to close our a career that we've had for almost 70 years," Ross said, adding that he and his brother are both glad to hear Mr. Bouchard's rehabilitation is going well.

"It's kind of sad, but now that it's all legal, he doesn't even come around any more," Ross said.

Will the Insurance Company Pay When Your Car is Stolen? Guess Again.

Will the Insurance Company Pay When Your Car is Stolen? Guess Again.

"My car was stolen and the insurance company won't pay me." This is a phone call I get too often – considering I do not advertise that I handle insurance claim denials. People only call me because they heard I handle "car cases." Close enough.

This area of the law disturbs me far more than the lemon law. I understand that a defective car gets made every now and then. But when your car gets stolen and you had insurance coverage for that, well – you expect the claim to be paid. That seems reasonable to me.

The vast majority of the calls I get on this are from minorities or from people who live in "bad" parts of town. You know, where cars are more likely to be stolen. Except that's not how most insurance companies view it. The insurance companies figure that you are more likely to have staged your theft to scam them if you are 1) poor, 2) a minority, or 3) live in a bad part of town.

So if 1, 2, or 3 describe you, bear in mind that the insurance you are paying good money for right now might be an illusion. The first case I ever handled on one of these was on behalf of an older woman who lived in one of the poorest neighborhoods of Detroit. Her station wagon had been stolen from in front of her house and recovered a few miles away, burned to a crisp in an alley. An insurance investigator combed through the ashes and decided that the car had been inoperable and rather than pay to have the engine fixed, my client had put the car in the alley, lit it on fire and walked home. My client was 67. They also theorized that – since they said the car did not run – she had pushed the car there. Her husband was an invalid. You do the math. We sued and after some ugly litigation, they paid her.

Another client's car was stolen near Mt. Clemens, north of Detroit, and recovered a few miles away, missing its license plate, battery, radio, steering wheel (presumably for the airbag), spare, and all four wheels. That case went to trial. The only witness for the insurance company was their investigator who testified that he had recommended the claim be denied because "nothing of value" was taken from the car. On cross examination I asked him, "The license plate was missing?" Yes. "The battery was missing?" Yes. And so on down the list. At the end of the list I asked again, "And it's your testimony that 'Nothing of value' was missing from the car?" To which he answered Yes.

The judge actually stopped us – held up his hands at the witness and me like a traffic cop – and asked the attorney for the insurance company, "Is this all you have?" This was a bench trial and the judge was going to be the one picking a winner. When they told him it was he said we could make closing arguments if we wanted to but they weren't necessary. He ruled in our favor.

In another case, an insurance expert witness testified that Corvettes "are impossible to steal." He had a lot of faith in the transponder key system and spent his entire direct talking about how they made cars "impossible to steal." On cross I asked him, among other things, "Couldn't I just bring a flatbed tow truck up behind the car, grab it and haul it away?" He said that was also impossible since someone would see me doing it.

Every attorney I know who handles these claims has seen the same thing I have: Insurance companies deny more claims made by minorities, the poor, and those who live in bad neighborhoods. Why? Michigan (like many states) has no "bad faith" law. If you sue the insurance company and win, they pay you the same amount of money, at best, that they would have paid you originally. They have nothing to lose by denying the claim. And if a person doesn't sue, then they come out ahead. In other words, it is in their best interest to deny claims if the odds are that some of those denied won't sue.

Why do they overwhelmingly deny claims of minorities and the poor? Because they are the least likely to be able to afford an attorney. And very few attorneys handle these cases. As we have discussed before, Michigan follows the American Rule in insurance cases – the litigants bear their own legal costs. The insured has to pay an attorney to fight one of these cases, usually out of the proceeds. So, your claim is denied. You sue and win. You get two-thirds of the recovery (after deduction of the costs of the action) and the attorney gets his/her one-third. You call that winning? You just lost a huge slice of the money you were entitled to.

My advice? If you suffer a loss try not to be poor, a minority or living in a bad part of town. If that's not something you can control, then I suggest avoiding insurance companies that price advertise. "We cost less!" Who cares? A better question is: Do you pay claims? Buy from companies with a better record of paying claims, even if they cost a little more. After all, if they aren't going to pay your claim, their "coverage" is worthless even if Anthony saved you enough money to buy a new purse.

Photo "Car Wreck" by Petr Kratochvil.

Steve Lehto has been practicing consumer protection and lemon law for 23 years in Michigan. He taught Consumer Protection at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law for ten years and wrote The Lemon Law Bible. He also wrote Chrysler's Turbine Car: The Rise and Fall of Detroit's Coolest Creation and The Great American Jet Pack: The Quest for the Ultimate Individual Lift Device. Follow him on Twitter if you liked this post. Twitter: @stevelehto

Insurance Basics for Stables

The tricky part about insurance is that you can lie awake at night worrying that you'll lose everything if you don't have enough insurance, or you can insure your stable to the point it bankrupts you. Somewhere in between you have to find a balance that provides enough coverage to make you comfortable, while also leaving money in the bank.

"I tell my clients that their best protection is like a three-legged stool. Proper documentation and proper structure (LLC, DBA, etc.) are the first two legs, and the third leg is always insurance," said Ruth Beardsley, a Connecticut attorney specializing in equine law. "No matter how good the first two legs are, accidents happen."

Regardless of the size of the facility, Beardsley encourages boarding facilities of all sizes to purchase an insurance policy. "If you are a personal horse owner and rent out one stall in your backyard or offer free board in exchange for help at the farm, that is considered commercial activity and falls outside your homeowner's policy," she explained.

Chances are your stable is larger than the one client scenario mentioned above, making it even more critical that you have the proper insurance policies in place to protect your business.

Commercial General Liability (CGL) Policy

Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies are designed to cover a broad range of accidents. CGL policies only cover third-party, "non-farm" employee claims that may claim against the stable. "Lesson people, clients or people watching a show on your property are considered third-party," she explained.

In Connecticut where Beardsley is an attorney, there is not a state mandate outlining minimum coverage requirements. "I recommend at least a $1-$2 million policy, but that may vary on how many horses the client has on the property and the value of the horses" she said.

When purchasing a CGL policy, know that there are two types of policy limits. The first is a "per occurrence" limit and the second is an "aggregate" limit.

A per occurrence minimum is the maximum amount of money an insurance company will pay for each individual claim made. For example, if there are three students riding in a lesson, a horse spooks and all three riders are bucked off and injured, a $1-million per occurrence policy will pay out up to $1 million to cover the injuries of all three riders.

Conversely, an aggregate limit is the highest sum an insurance policy will pay out within a policy period, which is typically one year. If several claims are made throughout the year, each individual occurrence can be paid up to the per occurrence policy limit, but if the total of all the claims exceeds the policy aggregate limit, the insurance company will not cover any claims over the aggregate limit.

Care, Custody and Control

Clients who board at your facility are entrusting you with their horses' well-being. In the event a horse is injured or dies due to an accident or negligence, a care, custody and control policy covers the related expense. "If an employee forgets to fill a water trough and the horse colics, a care, custody and control policy covers the vet bills," Beardsley explained.

Policy premiums will depend on the number of horses in your care and the value of those horses. "A backyard barn will likely have a lower premium than a barn that cares for A-Circuit shows," she said.

Care, custody and control policies only cover client horses. Accident or injury to a barn-owned horse is not covered under these policies. "Mortality and major medical insurance is like life and health insurance for a horse, and those are available for barn-owned horses," she added.

Worker's Compensation

When employees are hurt on the job, worker's compensation insurance covers the claim. This insurance is mandatory for all businesses, although the minimum requirements can vary.

Think you don't have any employees? Think again. "A lot of stables like to characterize their workers as independent contractors," Beardsley noted, but, "the courts don't always agree.

Hiring independent contractors rather than employees reduces taxes and worker's compensation expenses a stable may have to pay, but in the event a working individual is hurt at the stable, the courts may side with the employee on who is responsible for medical expenses.

Two links on the IRS website can help you decide what category individuals working on your farm fall into. "The IRS has tests you can use to determine if the person really is an employee or an independent contractor," she said.

Visit www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Independent-Contractor-(Self-Employed)-or-Employee%3Fn  or www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses&-Self-Employed/Behavioral-Control for additional details.

Instructor or Independent Contractor Insurance

If instructors and employees are considered independent contractors, be aware that these individuals are not covered under the stable's liability insurance policy. "A signed release does not cover non-farm employees," Beardsley cautioned. "You may want the benefits of an independent contractor, but they are not receiving any protection from the farm insurance."

In a situation where a rider is injured during a lesson taught by a non-farm instructor, the claim could come back against the farm if the instructor does not have a policy of their own.

"There are plenty of policies in Connecticut that cover traveling instructors and cover instructors regardless of where they teach," she explained.

Other states likely have similar policies, and it may be in everyone's best interest for a stable to require independent contractors carry their own insurance policies.

Business Insurances

In addition to the policies described, commercial auto insurance, farm insurance, property insurance and flood insurance may be additional insurances to consider for your stable.

Often stable owners use a personal vehicle to haul clients to a show or clinic. "Personal auto coverage includes a disclaimer for commercial transportation," Beardsley said.

The disclaimer excludes sharing of expenses like gas or tolls. "If you're making money on a regular basis hauling client horses, you'll need commercial van or trailer insurance," she added. 

Depending on the size of your stable, the business may also own several pieces of equipment critical to the day-to-day operations. Farm insurance policies can safeguard against breakdowns.

Property insurance and how that property is covered in the event of a disaster can also be complicated. Unless you have flood insurance, your insurance doesn't cover flooding. In the event of a tornado or other weather event that damages the facility, your insurance will cover repairs to the property and that's it. You won't just need a new building, it's could take months and during that time you'll have a loss of income. Check to see that your policy covers loss of income. 

Managing Risk

Ultimately insurance boils down to risk management and the level of risk you are comfortable living with. If you're lying awake at night fretting about disasters that could happen, that might be a sign you need to revisit the policies you have.

Choosing appropriate policy limits is only one piece of the puzzle. It's essential you understanding each policy, the exclusions and limitations. "It's a good idea to have all your policies wrapped up with one carrier so that you have a better chance of exclusions matching up with what is covered to avoid any gaps," she suggested.

Resources are available to help you decide what type and what amount of coverage makes sense for your stable. Contact your local farm bureau, local equine extension agency or state horse council. Each of these organizations should be able to provide a list of insurance agencies that provide coverage specific to the equine industry.

"If you don't have the right type of insurance, it's like having none at all," Beardsley concluded. 

 

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

Will Keeping Your Kids On Your Insurance Hurt Your Credit?

PHOTO: Just because parents are paying for their kids health insurance doesnt mean they want to pay their medical expenses, too. But are they liable for them?

Want Cheap Car Insurance? These 5 States Have the Lowest Rates


Even old cars are expensive to insure. Image source: KB35/Flickr.

With high prices at the pump and the ever-present need for regular auto maintenance and repairs, Americans are frustrated with how much it costs to drive these days. Car insurance is just one more thing that drivers have to worry about, and in many states you'll pay an arm and a leg for coverage. Yet going without insurance is illegal and carries major financial risks if you're in an accident.

Some states, however, have managed to stem the tide of rising insurance costs and offer their residents the lowest rates in the nation. Earlier this year, Insure.com looked at every state's insurance market to figure out which gave drivers the best bargains. Here are the five cheapest states on its list.


Images courtesy U.S. Mint.

5. Iowa
Drivers in Iowa pay an average of $1,058 for their auto insurance each year. That's consistent with the state's reputation for low car ownership costs generally, as the state topped the Bankrate list of cheapest places to own a vehicle. Insurance costs played a major role in that survey, with a slightly different methodology leading Bankrate to name Iowa the cheapest insurance market in the nation. But rock-bottom repair costs also had a hand in the results, offsetting the higher costs of gasoline that living in a rural state usually entail due to longer car trips.


Low repair costs can keep insurance rates low. Image source: Christopher Ziemnowicz, Wikimedia Commons.

4. Idaho
Idaho edges out Iowa for the No. 4 spot, with an average car insurance rate of $1,053 annually. Like Iowa, Idaho has the advantage of being sparsely populated, with the rural nature of most of the state helping to keep the perils of city driving to a minimum. One report from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners found Idaho's costs to be the lowest in the nation, again using a slightly different methodology from the Insure.com study but confirming the relative affordability of insurance for state residents.

3. New Hampshire
New Hampshire is one of just three states to break the $1,000 barrier for car insurance costs, weighing in at $983 for the typical driver. Yet the New England state was actually found to be the most expensive in which to insure teenage drivers, with rates more than doubling when families add a teen to their car insurance coverage. New Hampshire is one of three states in which insurance giant Allstate is testing its Drivewise car-monitoring smartphone app, as it seeks to keep up with insurance rivals collecting more information on their drivers. By learning more about what behavior leads to greater accidents, insurance companies hope to roll out similar programs across the nation to produce similar savings.


Avoiding tickets is a way to keep costs down. Image source: Woodleywonderworks, Flickr.

2. Maine
In Maine, car insurance runs an average of $964 per year. With a small population and relatively few urban areas, Maine doesn't encounter the traffic snarls that plague much of the country and lead to the minor accidents that jack up insurance rates elsewhere. In addition, Maine's legal system is notorious for having juries that avoid awarding big verdicts, and low rates of auto theft also keep premiums down.

1. Ohio
Ohio tops the list of cheap car insurance states, sporting an average premium of just $926 annually. In some ways, Ohio's presence in the No. 1 slot is a surprise, given its extensive urban areas and high population. But insurance regulation in Ohio helps keep premiums down, and a heavily competitive insurance-company network featuring hundreds of different car insurance providers also leads to lower rates for drivers. Amazingly, those measures have kept average auto insurance expenses flat compared to what drivers paid 12 years ago.

If you live elsewhere, the prospect of paying these low rates for car insurance might look very appealing. Yet even these reduced costs present a challenge to many drivers, especially in parts of those states where high unemployment rates and low wages make it tough to make ends meet. Still, insurance regulators and other policymakers could learn some lessons from the ways in which these five states keep their costs down, and make them more manageable for their drivers.

This is Warren Buffett's worst automotive nightmare
A major technological shift is happening in the automotive industry. Most people are skeptical about its impact. Warren Buffett isn't one of them. He recently called it a "real threat" to one of his favorite businesses. An auto executive called the technology "fantastic." The beauty for investors is that there is an easy way to ride this megatrend. Click here to access our exclusive report on this stock.

Monday, 25 August 2014

Government suffers setback as opposition baulks at insurance reform bill

NEW DELHI Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:47pm IST

People stand in front of the parliament building on the opening day of the winter session in New Delhi November 22, 2012. REUTERS/B Mathur/Files

People stand in front of the parliament building on the opening day of the winter session in New Delhi November 22, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/B Mathur/Files

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Plans by the new government to open the insurance sector to more foreign investment suffered a setback on Thursday after the opposition blocked the legislation in the upper house.

The landmark bill to liberalise the insurance industry, which marks Prime Minister Narendra Modi's first stab at legislative reforms, will now go to a parliamentary committee, which will submit a report later this year.

The bill proposes to increase the limit on foreign investment in insurance ventures to 49 percent from the current 26 percent.

Modi took office in May vowing to restore economic momentum and end years of policy paralysis, but the Congress-led opposition which has a majority in the Rajya Sabha demanded that a parliamentary panel examine the bill, saying there was no hurry to approve the measure in the current session which ends on Thursday.

"The government wanted to hurriedly pass FDI in Insurance, I'm happy that its now gone to a select committee," said Trinamool Congress MP Derek O'Brien.

Modi's government expects that if the sector is opened further, insurers such as Canada's Sun Life Financial (SLF.TO) Inc, Prudential PLC (PRU.L) Nippon Life Insurance Co,Italy's Generali and Dutch insurer Aegon NV (AEGN.AS) will inject more funds into what is the world's 10th biggest life insurance market - even though currently fewer than 4 percent of Indians have insurance.

Modi hopes such a step would help improve investor confidence in the broader economy sapped by years of policy neglect and dithering.

The Bharatiya Janata Party-led government has a majority in the Lok Sabha after the election in May and should face few problems in getting the bill cleared in that chamber.

The two main parties - the BJP and the Congress - remain bitter opponents even after the electoral battle, seeking to deny the other any political advantage.

When in opposition, both parties have sought to whip up resistance to liberalising sectors of the economy such as insurance and defence, and to labour reforms. Such steps are considered vital to reviving growth that last year fell to 4.7 percent, the slowest pace in a decade.

While the move to change ownership rules in the insurance business has suffered a delay, the government succeeded in pushing through other legislation including greater oversight on appointments of judges.

It introduced 13 new bills in the current session, of which four have been passed. One bill was withdrawn, leaving in effect 68 bills pending, the PRS Legislative Research said in a note.

Among the bills introduced was a first step at labour reforms, including allowing women to work night shifts and easing rules for hiring apprentices. The bill will be taken up for debate in the next session.

The previous government's efforts to move any kind of business in parliament were blocked by disruptions.

(Reporting by Nigam Prusty and Manoj Kumar; Writing by Sanjeev Miglani; Editing by Kim Coghill)